Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

Boundary speak in sustainability studies: Computational reading of a transversal field

Urheber*innen
/persons/resource/864

Herberg,  Jeremias
IASS Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies Potsdam;

/persons/resource/431

Schmitz,  Sean
IASS Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies Potsdam;

/persons/resource/854

Stasiak,  Dorota
IASS Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies Potsdam;

Schmieg,  Gregor
External Organizations;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)

6001028.pdf
(Verlagsversion), 678KB

Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Herberg, J., Schmitz, S., Stasiak, D., Schmieg, G. (2021): Boundary speak in sustainability studies: Computational reading of a transversal field. - Science & public policy, 48, 3, 398-411.
https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab006


Zitierlink: https://publications.iass-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_6001028
Zusammenfassung
This article discusses the role of language in the collaboration between science, policy, and society. Combining computational methods of corpus linguistics (manifold learning) with sociological field theories, we analyze approximately 30,000 articles that were published in the field of transdisciplinary sustainability studies. We show that the field oscillates between deliberative and technocratic vocabularies and can therefore be characterized as a transversal field. We conclude that researchers who collaborate in science–society interstices are thrown into a semantic pluralism that cannot be boiled down to a common language. For transdisciplinary research practice and corresponding science policies, this involves trade-offs between generating a homogenous language and a collaborative appeal; between creating a stable creole and a situated semantic plurality. A corresponding theoretical viewpoint and science policy approach should be based on a pluralist view on the science–society–policy interplay.