English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

A Precautionary Assessment of Systemic Projections and Promises From Sunlight Reflection and Carbon Removal Modeling

Authors
/persons/resource/75

Low,  Sean
IASS Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies Potsdam;

/persons/resource/409

Honegger,  Matthias
IASS Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies Potsdam;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)

risa.13565.pdf
(Publisher version), 234KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Low, S., Honegger, M. (2020 online): A Precautionary Assessment of Systemic Projections and Promises From Sunlight Reflection and Carbon Removal Modeling. - Risk analysis.
https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13565


Cite as: https://publications.iass-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_6000259
Abstract
Climate change is a paradigmatic example of systemic risk. Recently, proposals for large‐scale interventions—carbon dioxide removal (CDR) and solar radiation management (SRM)—have started to redefine climate governance strategies. We describe how evolving modeling practices are trending toward optimized and “best‐case” projections —portraying deployment schemes that create both technically slanted and politically sanitized profiles of risk, as well as ideal objectives for CDR and SRM as mitigation‐enhancing, time‐buying mechanisms for carbon transitions or vulnerable populations. As promises , stylized and hopeful projections may selectively reinforce industry and political activities built around the inertia of the carbon economy. Some evidence suggests this is the emerging case for certain kinds of CDR, where the prospect of future carbon capture substitutes for present mitigation. Either of these implications are systemic: explorations of climatic futures may entrench certain carbon infrastructures. We point out efforts and recommendations to forestall this trend in the implementation of the Paris Agreement, by creating more stakeholder input and strengthening political realism in modeling and other assessments, as well as through policy guardrails.