English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Building authority and legitimacy in transnational climate change governance: Evidence from the Governors’ Climate and Forests Task Force

Authors

Di Gregorio,  Monica
External Organizations;

Massarella,  Kate
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/1476

Schroeder,  Heike
IASS Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies Potsdam;

Brockhaus,  Maria
External Organizations;

Pham,  Thuy Thu
External Organizations;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in IASSpublic
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Di Gregorio, M., Massarella, K., Schroeder, H., Brockhaus, M., Pham, T. T. (2020): Building authority and legitimacy in transnational climate change governance: Evidence from the Governors’ Climate and Forests Task Force. - Global environmental change: human and policy dimensions, 64, 102126.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102126


Cite as: https://publications.iass-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_6000237
Abstract
Transnational climate change initiatives have increased in number and relevance within the global climate change regime. Despite being largely welcomed, there are concerns about their ability to deliver ambitious climate action and about their democratic legitimacy. This paper disentangles the nature of both authority and legitimacy of a specific form of transnational networks, transgovernmental networks of subnational governments. It then investigates how a major transgovernmental initiative focusing on tropical forests, the Governors’ Climate and Forests Task Force, attempts to command authority and to build and maintain its legitimacy. The paper illustrates the particular challenges faced by initiatives formed primarily by jurisdictions from the Global South. Three major trade-offs related to authority and legitimacy dimensions are identified: first, the difficulty of balancing the need for increased representation with performance on ambitious climate goals; second, the need to deliver effectiveness while ensuring transparency of governance processes; and third, the limited ability to leverage formal authority of members to deliver climate action in local jurisdictions, while depending on external funds from the Global North.