Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  A Precautionary Assessment of Systemic Projections and Promises From Sunlight Reflection and Carbon Removal Modeling

Low, S., Honegger, M. (2020 online): A Precautionary Assessment of Systemic Projections and Promises From Sunlight Reflection and Carbon Removal Modeling. - Risk analysis.
https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13565

Item is

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
risa.13565.pdf (Verlagsversion), 234KB
Name:
risa.13565.pdf
Beschreibung:
Fulltext
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Low, Sean1, Autor              
Honegger, Matthias1, Autor              
Affiliations:
1IASS Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies Potsdam, ou_96022              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: Carbon dioxide removal, modeling projections, precautionary measures, solar radiation management, systemic risk
 Zusammenfassung: Climate change is a paradigmatic example of systemic risk. Recently, proposals for large‐scale interventions—carbon dioxide removal (CDR) and solar radiation management (SRM)—have started to redefine climate governance strategies. We describe how evolving modeling practices are trending toward optimized and “best‐case” projections —portraying deployment schemes that create both technically slanted and politically sanitized profiles of risk, as well as ideal objectives for CDR and SRM as mitigation‐enhancing, time‐buying mechanisms for carbon transitions or vulnerable populations. As promises , stylized and hopeful projections may selectively reinforce industry and political activities built around the inertia of the carbon economy. Some evidence suggests this is the emerging case for certain kinds of CDR, where the prospect of future carbon capture substitutes for present mitigation. Either of these implications are systemic: explorations of climatic futures may entrench certain carbon infrastructures. We point out efforts and recommendations to forestall this trend in the implementation of the Paris Agreement, by creating more stakeholder input and strengthening political realism in modeling and other assessments, as well as through policy guardrails.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - Englisch
 Datum: 2020-072020-07-28
 Publikationsstatus: Online veröffentlicht
 Seiten: 15
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: -
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1111/risa.13565
RIFSPROJECT: S&R
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Risk analysis
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift, E14, SCI, SSCI, Scopus
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: Wiley
Seiten: - Band / Heft: - Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: - Identifikator: ISSN: 0272-4332
ISSN: 1539-6924
CoNE: https://publications.rifs-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/20190607a