English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  A Precautionary Assessment of Systemic Projections and Promises From Sunlight Reflection and Carbon Removal Modeling

Low, S., Honegger, M. (2020 online): A Precautionary Assessment of Systemic Projections and Promises From Sunlight Reflection and Carbon Removal Modeling. - Risk analysis.
https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13565

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: https://publications.iass-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_6000259 Version Permalink: https://publications.iass-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_6000259_1
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
risa.13565.pdf (Publisher version), 234KB
Name:
risa.13565.pdf
Description:
Fulltext
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Low, Sean1, Author              
Honegger, Matthias1, Author              
Affiliations:
1IASS Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies Potsdam, ou_96022              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Carbon dioxide removal, modeling projections, precautionary measures, solar radiation management, systemic risk
 Abstract: Climate change is a paradigmatic example of systemic risk. Recently, proposals for large‐scale interventions—carbon dioxide removal (CDR) and solar radiation management (SRM)—have started to redefine climate governance strategies. We describe how evolving modeling practices are trending toward optimized and “best‐case” projections —portraying deployment schemes that create both technically slanted and politically sanitized profiles of risk, as well as ideal objectives for CDR and SRM as mitigation‐enhancing, time‐buying mechanisms for carbon transitions or vulnerable populations. As promises , stylized and hopeful projections may selectively reinforce industry and political activities built around the inertia of the carbon economy. Some evidence suggests this is the emerging case for certain kinds of CDR, where the prospect of future carbon capture substitutes for present mitigation. Either of these implications are systemic: explorations of climatic futures may entrench certain carbon infrastructures. We point out efforts and recommendations to forestall this trend in the implementation of the Paris Agreement, by creating more stakeholder input and strengthening political realism in modeling and other assessments, as well as through policy guardrails.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2020-072020-07-28
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: 15
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Method: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1111/risa.13565
IASSPROJECT: S&R
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Risk analysis
Source Genre: Journal, E14, SCI, SSCI, Scopus
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Wiley
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: - Identifier: ISSN: 0272-4332
ISSN: 1539-6924
CoNE: https://publications.iass-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/20190607a