Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Who Is Paying for Carbon Dioxide Removal? Designing Policy Instruments for Mobilizing Negative Emissions Technologies

Honegger, M., Poralla, M., Michaelowa, A., Ahonen, H.-M. (2021): Who Is Paying for Carbon Dioxide Removal? Designing Policy Instruments for Mobilizing Negative Emissions Technologies. - Frontiers in climate, 3, 672996.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.672996

Item is

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
6001123.pdf (Verlagsversion), 299KB
Name:
6001123.pdf
Beschreibung:
Fulltext
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
CC-BY 4.0

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Honegger, Matthias1, Autor              
Poralla, Matthias2, Autor
Michaelowa, Axel2, Autor
Ahonen, Hanna-Mari2, Autor
Affiliations:
1IASS Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies Potsdam, ou_96022              
2External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) poses a significant and complex public policy challenge in the long-term. Presently treated as a marginal aspect of climate policy, addressing CDR as a public good is quickly becoming essential for limiting warming to well below 2 or 1.5°C by achieving net-zero emissions in time – including by mobilization of public and private finance. In this policy and practice review, we develop six functions jointly needed for policy mixes mobilizing CDR in a manner compatible with the Paris Agreement's objectives. We discuss the emerging CDR financing efforts in light of these functions, and we chart a path to a meaningful long-term structuring of policies and financing instruments. CDR characteristics point to the need for up-front capital, continuous funding for scaling, and long-term operating funding streams, as well as differentiation based on permanence of storage and should influence the design of policy instruments. Transparency and early public deliberation are essential for charting a politically stable course of action on CDR, while specific policy designs are being developed in a way that ensures effectiveness, prevents rent-seeking at public expense, and allows for iterative course corrections. We propose a stepwise approach whereby various CDR approaches initially need differentiated treatment based on their differing maturity and cost through R&D pilot activity subsidies. In the longer term, CDR increasingly ought to be funded through mitigation results-oriented financing and included in broader policy instruments. We conclude that CDR needs to become a regularly-provided public service like public waste management has become over the last century.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - Englisch
 Datum: 2021-072021-06-072021-07
 Publikationsstatus: Final veröffentlicht
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: -
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.3389/fclim.2021.672996
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Frontiers in climate
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift, E14, oa
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 3 Artikelnummer: 672996 Start- / Endseite: - Identifikator: ISSN: 2624-9553
CoNE: https://publications.rifs-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/20200910a