English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Who Is Paying for Carbon Dioxide Removal? Designing Policy Instruments for Mobilizing Negative Emissions Technologies

Honegger, M., Poralla, M., Michaelowa, A., Ahonen, H.-M. (2021): Who Is Paying for Carbon Dioxide Removal? Designing Policy Instruments for Mobilizing Negative Emissions Technologies. - Frontiers in climate, 3, 672996.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.672996

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
6001123.pdf (Publisher version), 299KB
Name:
6001123.pdf
Description:
Fulltext
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
CC-BY 4.0

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Honegger, Matthias1, Author              
Poralla, Matthias2, Author
Michaelowa, Axel2, Author
Ahonen, Hanna-Mari2, Author
Affiliations:
1IASS Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies Potsdam, ou_96022              
2External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) poses a significant and complex public policy challenge in the long-term. Presently treated as a marginal aspect of climate policy, addressing CDR as a public good is quickly becoming essential for limiting warming to well below 2 or 1.5°C by achieving net-zero emissions in time – including by mobilization of public and private finance. In this policy and practice review, we develop six functions jointly needed for policy mixes mobilizing CDR in a manner compatible with the Paris Agreement's objectives. We discuss the emerging CDR financing efforts in light of these functions, and we chart a path to a meaningful long-term structuring of policies and financing instruments. CDR characteristics point to the need for up-front capital, continuous funding for scaling, and long-term operating funding streams, as well as differentiation based on permanence of storage and should influence the design of policy instruments. Transparency and early public deliberation are essential for charting a politically stable course of action on CDR, while specific policy designs are being developed in a way that ensures effectiveness, prevents rent-seeking at public expense, and allows for iterative course corrections. We propose a stepwise approach whereby various CDR approaches initially need differentiated treatment based on their differing maturity and cost through R&D pilot activity subsidies. In the longer term, CDR increasingly ought to be funded through mitigation results-oriented financing and included in broader policy instruments. We conclude that CDR needs to become a regularly-provided public service like public waste management has become over the last century.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2021-072021-06-072021-07
 Publication Status: Finally published
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.3389/fclim.2021.672996
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Frontiers in climate
Source Genre: Journal, E14, oa
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 3 Sequence Number: 672996 Start / End Page: - Identifier: ISSN: 2624-9553
CoNE: https://publications.rifs-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/20200910a