de.mpg.escidoc.pubman.appbase.FacesBean
English
 
Contact usLogin
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

 
 
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  • Please note that a newer version of this item is in progress.
  Tools of the trade. Practices and politics of researching the future in climate engineering

Low, S., Schäfer, S. (2019 online): Tools of the trade. Practices and politics of researching the future in climate engineering. - Sustainability science.
DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00692-x

Fulltext: 4217888.pdf



Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: Version Permalink: http://publications.iass-potsdam.de/pubman/item/escidoc:4217888:3
Latest Version: http://hdl.handle.net/someHandle/test/escidoc:4217888:4
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
4217888.pdf (Publisher version), 499KB
Description:
Fulltext
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
CC BY 4.0

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Low, Sean1, Author              
Schäfer, Stefan1, Author              
Affiliations:
1IASS Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies Potsdam, escidoc:96022              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Futures; climate engineering; methodology; research practice; epistemology; risk
 Abstract: Making sense of the implications of climate engineering approaches (solar radiation management, SRM; and carbon dioxide removal, CDR) at planetary scales occurs via a host of methods that calculate, project, and imagine the future in distinct ways. We take a systemic and synthesizing view of some of the (inter)disciplinary methods by which these futures are derived: climate and integrated assessment modeling, ‘deductive’ modes of social science inquiry, deliberative stakeholder engagement, and foresight-based scenarios. We speak to the epistemologies, objectives, and user communities surrounding these research practices, highlighting that different modes of constructing and interpreting evidence about an unformed future yield different kinds of results and signals for actions to be taken. We show how different methods for exploring ‘futures’ form an evolving history of how the risks of CE have been assessed (or constructed), and conclude by echoing calls for a stronger shared understanding of the practices and politics that underpin future-oriented research.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2019-052019-05
 Pages: 10
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Method: -
 Identifiers: DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00692-x
URI: http://doi.crossref.org/servlet/query?format=unixref&pid=bib@gfz-potsdam.de&id=10.1007/s11625-019-00692-x
Project: http://publications.iass-potsdam.de/cone/iassprojects/resource/42
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Sustainability science
Source Genre: Journal, E14, SCI, Scopus
 Creator(s):
-
Affiliations:
-
Publ. Info: Tokio : Springer Japan
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: - Identifier: ISSN: 1862-4065
ISSN: 1862-4057
CoNE: http://publications.iass-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/20180319a